Influence of cultural diversity and community support on students’ competence in the English language in secondary schools in Buvuma district, Uganda, a cross-sectional study.

Authors

  • Tryphena Nabejja School of Graduate Studies, Kampala University-Uganda Author
  • Joseph Muyunga School of Graduate Studies, Kampala University-Uganda Author
  • Eric Niringiyimana School of Graduate Studies, Kampala University-Uganda Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/vx05sc81

Keywords:

Cultural Diversity, Community Support, Competence, Buvuma District

Abstract

Background:

Competence in English requires linguistic, sociolinguistic, and strategic competence, encompassing error-free vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, cultural understanding, and effective communication strategies in various situations. This study aimed to assess the impact of Cultural Diversity and Community Support on the English language proficiency of students in secondary schools in Buvuma District.

 Methodology:

 A cross-sectional study design was adopted with qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection, while employing the questionnaire method for teachers, interviews for head teachers and chairpersons, and focus group discussions for the students. 346 respondents were sampled, including 68 teachers, 280 students, 4 head teachers, and 4 chairpersons of the board of directors. Sample size was obtained using census, simple random, and convenience sampling techniques, and data was analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and regression analysis.

 Results:

Findings show that 44.1% of respondents were 40–50 years, 55.9% were male, while 44.1% were female. Majority, 52.9% were married, 48.5% had a degree, and 29.4% had postgraduate or Master’s Qualifications. Following regression analysis, there was a significant positive relationship between recognizing cultural diversity and students' competencies in English. The coefficient (B) of 0.323 indicates that as cultural diversity increased, students' competencies in English also increased. Community support in language development certainly has a significant and positive impact on students' competencies in English. The coefficient of 0.310 indicates that students' English competencies should rise by.310 units for every unit increase in community support.

 Conclusion:

Community support provides access to resources promoting language skills.

 Recommendation:

Prioritize socio-cultural factors to facilitate students’ English competency, as these factors often stem from the students’ home society.

Author Biographies

  • Tryphena Nabejja, School of Graduate Studies, Kampala University-Uganda

    is a student pursuing his Master’s Degree in Education at Kampala University.

  • Joseph Muyunga, School of Graduate Studies, Kampala University-Uganda

    is a lecturer and Research Supervisor at Kampala University.

  • Eric Niringiyimana, School of Graduate Studies, Kampala University-Uganda

    is a co-author of this particular research.

References

1. Abdullah, F., Hidayati, A. N., Andriani, A., & Tandiana, S. T. (2022). Deciphering Tour Guides’ English Communicative Competence: Some Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of English Language Studies, 7(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.30870/jels.v7i1.14241

2. Adigun, C. O. (2023, May 1). Teacher Socio-Linguistic Factors and Learning Outcomes in English Language among Public Senior Secondary Students in the Ibadan Metropolis, Nigeria. http://140.105.46.132:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1989

3. Ahmed, S. (2016, August 1). Influence of students’ socio-cultural and educational background on English language learning. https://dspace.bracu.ac.bd/xmlui/handle/10361/7999

4. Amal, M. (2016, December 13). Which method should I use to present the mean of a 5-point Likert scale? ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Whichmethod-should-I-use-to-present-the-Mean-ofa-5-point-Likert-scale

5. Becker, T. M., Prat, C. S., & Stocco, A. (2016). A network-level analysis of cognitive flexibility reveals a differential influence of the anterior cingulate cortex in bilinguals versus monolinguals. Neuropsychologia, 85, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.020

6. Cacciattolo, M., & Aronson, G. (2023). The Role of International Study Tours in Cultivating Ethnocultural Empathy: Preservice Teacher Standpoints. In Sustainable Development Goals Series (pp. 261–275). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5008-7_18

7. Dahlberg, G. M., & Gross, B. (2024). Cultural-linguistic diversity in Italy and Sweden? A sociomaterial analysis of policies for heritage language education. Intercultural Education, 35(2), 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2024.2314380

8. Dougherty, E. (n.d.). Opportunities for Second Language Development with the Use of Digital Tools: Analyzing the Experience of a Multi-Age Primary Community from an Activity Theory Perspective. Digital Scholarship@UNLV. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations/4138/

9. Greve, W., Koch, M., Rasche, V., & Kersten, K. (2021). Extending the scope of the ‘cognitive advantage’ hypothesis: multilingual individuals show higher flexibility of goal adjustment. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(4), 822–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1922420

10. Herrera, L. J. P., & McNair, R. L. (2020). Restorative and community‐building practices as social justice for English learners. TESOL Journal, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.523

11. Hossain, K. I. (2024). Reviewing the role of culture in English language learning: Challenges and opportunities for teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100781

12. Izydorczyk, B., Sitnik-Warchulska, K., Lizińczyk, S., & Lipowska, M. (2020). Socio-Cultural Standards Promoted by the Mass Media as Predictors of Restrictive and Bulimic Behavior. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00506

13. Kim, D. (2020). Learning Language, Learning Culture: Teaching Language to the Whole Student. ECNU Review of Education, 3(3), 519–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120936693

14. Kiramba, L. K., Kumi-Yeboah, A., Smith, P., & Sallar, A. M. (2021). Cultural and linguistic experiences of immigrant youth: voices of African immigrant youth in United States Urban Schools. Multicultural Education Review, 13(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/2005615x.2021.1890312

15. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.

16. Kukulska-Hulme, A., Giri, R. A., Dawadi, S., Devkota, K. R., & Gaved, M. (2023). Languages and technologies in education at school and outside of school: Perspectives from young people in low-resource countries in Africa and Asia. Frontiers in Communication, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1081155

17. Lavrenteva, E., & Orland-Barak, L. (2020). Teaching culture in the EFL classroom as informed by teachers’ approaches to student diversity. Research Papers in Education, 37(5), 633–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864763

18. Meehan, A., De Almeida, S., Bäckström, B., Borg-Axisa, G., Friant, N., Johannessen, Y. L., & Roman, M. (2021). Context rules! Top-level education policies for newly arrived migrant students across six European countries. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2021.100046

19. Nguyen, H. T. M. (2017). Models of Mentoring in Language Teacher Education. In English language education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44151-1

20. Ntabwoba, L., & Sikubwabo, C. (2024). Influence of Family Background on English Language Proficiency among Learners in Nine- and Twelve-Year Basic Education Schools: A Case of Musanze District, Rwanda. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.5.2.12

21. Ouedraogo, S. V. (2021). Intercultural Understanding and Pedagogy of Empathy: A Cultural Experiential Learning from an Interdisciplinary Dialogue Project. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 42(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2021.1930726

22. Raude, J., Lecrique, J. M., Lasbeur, L., Leon, C., Guignard, R., Du Roscoät, E., & Arwidson, P. (2020). Determinants of Preventive Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in France: Comparing the Sociocultural, Psychosocial, and Social Cognitive Explanations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584500

23. Rice, Z. S., & Liamputtong, P. (2023). Cultural Determinants of Health, Cross-Cultural Research and Global Public Health. In Springer eBooks (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96778-9_44-1

24. Shoebottom, P. (n.d.-a). The language learning theories of Professor J. Cummins. https://www.internationalschooltutors.de/English/advice/teachers/info/cummins.html

25. Warren, C. A. (2017). Empathy, Teacher Dispositions, and Preparation for Culturally Responsive Pedagogy. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117712487

26. Wilcoxen, C., Steiner, A., & Bell, J. (2021). Strengthening Preservice Teachers’ Understanding of Culturally Responsive Classrooms through Exposure, Immersion, and Dialogue. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.54656/flxy2991

27. Zajda, J. (2024). Social and Cultural Factors and Their Influences on Engagement in the Classroom. In Globalization, comparative education and policy research (pp. 97–115). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61613-6_7

Downloads

Published

2026-04-08

Issue

Section

Original Peer-Reviewed Articles

How to Cite

Nabejja, T., Muyunga, J., & Niringiyimana, E. (2026). Influence of cultural diversity and community support on students’ competence in the English language in secondary schools in Buvuma district, Uganda, a cross-sectional study. SJ Education Research Africa, 3(4), 21. https://doi.org/10.51168/vx05sc81

Similar Articles

41-50 of 82

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.