School management communication practices in government-aided secondary schools within Mbarara city. A cross-sectional study.

Authors

  • Enock Bahereza Directorate of Graduate Studies, Research, and Innovations, Bishop Stuart University Author
  • Dr. Basil Tibanyendera Author
  • Rev.Can. Kabakyenga Asaph Directorate of Graduate Studies, Research, and Innovations, Bishop Stuart University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/r3q55s65

Keywords:

.

Abstract

Background

School management communication practices are essential for ensuring that school policies, rules, and expectations are clearly shared among administrators, teachers, and students. This study aims to assess the school management communication practices in government-aided secondary schools within Mbarara City.

 Methodology

A descriptive cross-sectional survey research design was adopted. Both the questionnaire survey and an interview were used. Data was analyzed using a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and quantitative techniques.

 Results

The study had 100 respondents, 65% were male, while 35, representing 35%, were female. 55% were aged between 21 and 30 years, and respondents aged between 31 and 40 years constituted 21% of the total sample. 14% were 41–50 years, and respondents aged 51 years and above accounted for 10%. The majority of student leaders and teachers agreed that school rules, policies, and expectations are clearly communicated to students, with 20% strongly agreeing and 60% agreeing, resulting in a mean score of 2.05 (SD = 0.744). 18% strongly agreed, and 62% agreed that management regularly communicates updates on school events, with a mean of 2.08 (SD = 0.748). Responses regarding student involvement in meetings were more mixed, with only 10% strongly agreeing and 40% agreeing, while 35% remained neutral. The use of transparent communication channels, such as assemblies and notice boards, was strongly acknowledged, with 15% strongly agreeing and 65% agreeing (M = 2.11, SD = 0.723). 68% of respondents agreed that they are encouraged to share concerns (M = 2.13, SD = 0.677).

 Conclusion

School management in government-aided secondary schools in Mbarara City generally communicates rules, policies, and updates effectively through assemblies and other channels, though student involvement in decision-making remains limited.

 Recommendation

Schools should strengthen participatory communication by involving students more in meetings and feedback platforms to enhance transparency, engagement, and effective school management.

Author Biographies

  • Enock Bahereza, Directorate of Graduate Studies, Research, and Innovations, Bishop Stuart University

    holds a Master of Education in Management, Planning, and Administration from Bishop Stuart University.

  • Dr. Basil Tibanyendera

    is a senior lecturer from Bishop Stuart University

  • Rev.Can. Kabakyenga Asaph, Directorate of Graduate Studies, Research, and Innovations, Bishop Stuart University

    is a senior lecturer from Bishop Stuart University

References

1. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2022). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russell Sage Foundation.

2. Bush, T. (2011). Theories of educational leadership and management (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

3. Epstein, J. L. (2021). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400780-2 PMid:34658286

4. Fullan, M. (2021). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003131496-6

5. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2019). Sustainable leadership. Jossey-Bass.

6. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

7. Kangavve, J. (2006). Student indiscipline in Uganda's secondary schools. Makerere University Press.

8. Kyoshaba, M. (2016). Communication practices and school management effectiveness in secondary schools in Uganda. Uganda Journal of Education, 10(2), 45-58.

9. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2018). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leadership to school improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321501

10. Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. Jossey-Bass.

11. Louis, K. S., & Marks, H. M. (2018). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and student experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532-575. https://doi.org/10.1086/444197

12. Nakabugo, M. G. (2018). School leadership and management practices in Uganda's secondary schools. Fountain Publishers.

13. Okumbe, J. A. (2001). Educational management: Theory and practice. Nairobi University Press.

14. Smylie, M. A., & Evans, A. E. (2016). Social capital and the problem of educational improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780791481431-011

15. Tumwine, J. (2017). Student participation in school governance and its influence on discipline in secondary schools in Uganda. International Journal of Educational Policy Research, 5(3), 21-30.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

Issue

Section

Original Peer-Reviewed Articles

How to Cite

Bahereza, E., Tibanyendera, D. B., & Asaph, R. K. (2026). School management communication practices in government-aided secondary schools within Mbarara city. A cross-sectional study. SJ Education Research Africa, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.51168/r3q55s65