Assessment of institutional-related challenges and prospects to implementation of e-learning midwifery curriculum in Nursing and Midwifery training institutions in Uganda: A Cross-sectional study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/kg85b333Keywords:
Curriculum, E-Learning, Midwifery, Implementation, Health Tutors, Trainees, effective, efficientAbstract
Background:
Uganda's Ministry of Education and Sports, through the BTVET Directorate, aims to implement e-learning for midwife training. The study aimed to identify challenges and prospects to the effective implementation of e-learning midwifery curriculum in Nursing and Midwifery Training Institutions in Uganda, and propose strategies for effective implementation.
Methods:
Based on the Technology Acceptance Model, a cross-sectional study utilising a mixed methods research approach and pragmatist paradigm was conducted across 12 Nursing and Midwifery Training Institutions in Uganda, involving 52 Health Tutors, 11 Principals, and 152 students of the e-learning midwifery program. Data were collected using questionnaires, interview guides, and checklists, and were analyzed with SPSS (21.0) to generate descriptive statistics.
Results:
The study revealed that financial difficulties majorly hinder the effective implementation of the e-learning midwifery curriculum in Uganda. Key findings include 68.4% of respondents viewing class-time usage as ineffective, 61.2% cited inadequate staff commitment, lack of necessary resources such as curriculum copies (77%), updated work schemes (58%), and lesson plans (62%). Additionally, 92% of institutions lack active e-library systems, 52% lack online learning platforms, and 85% have no implementation and monitoring plans. However, experienced tutors, balanced institutional ownership, and a conducive learning environment present prospects for improvement dependent on enhancing ICT infrastructure.
Conclusion:
Uganda's e-learning midwifery curriculum implementation faces challenges like insufficient funding, poor teacher preparation, limited digital resource access, and inadequate infrastructure. However, the presence of experienced Health Tutors, Self-Motivation among students, and a supportive learning environment suggest opportunities for enhancement.
Recommendations:
Funding and scholarships for e-learning midwifery trainees, regular curriculum review and availability, strategies for effective use of class time, flexible tuition payment policies, e-platforms and e-libraries, and adherence to schemes of work can ensure successful and effective implementation of the e-learning midwifery curriculum in Uganda.
References
1.Adepeji. (2019). Now That Women Play Apiiri Music in Ekiti, Nigeria. 8(02), 68-74.
2.Agarwal, A., & Mishra, S. (2020). E-Learning : A Double-Edged Sword ? An Empirical Investigation. May.
3.Akar, H. (2023). Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange ( JETDE ) Digitizing borderless higher education landscapes through curriculum policy change to educate global citizens. 15(2). https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1502.01
4.Barone, D., & Wright, T. E. (2020). Literacy Instruction With Digital and Media Technologies. The Reading Teacher, 62(4), 292-302. https://doi.org/10. 1598/rt.62.4.2
5.C. Nunnally. (1978). An Overview of. 97-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4
6.Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2020). The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4-5), 404-420. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijkl.2007.0 16702
7.Eom, S. (2015). Association for Information Systems. The Effects of Student Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning Strategies on Students' s Perceived E-learning Outcomes and Satisfaction. Recommended Citation Eom, Sean, "The Effects of Student Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning. Association for Information Systems, 2015 Proceedings (12), 1-15. http://aisel.aisnet.org/siged2015http://aisel.aisnet. org/siged2015/12
8.Gautam, Singh, G., Bhatnagar, V., Gupta, R., & Kumar. (2020). Exploration of E-Learning Vs Traditional Learning in India. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(2), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.829
9.Gautam, M. G. (2015). College Students' Perspective on Online Teaching and Learning Methods During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 22(4), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.54986/irjee/ 2022/oct_dec/118-123
10.Harerimana, A., Mtshali, N. G., Hewing, H., Maniriho, F., Kyamusoke, E. B., Mukankaka, A., Rukundo, E., Gasurira, S., Mukamana, D., & Mugarura, J. (2016). E-Learning in Nursing Education in Rwanda: Benefits and Challenges. An Exploration of Participants' Perceptives. IOSR Journal of Nursing and Health Science, 5(2), 64-92. https://doi.org/10.9790/1959-0502036492
11.Kibuku, O. (2023). How Digital Divide Lingers on in South African Higher Education : Lived Experiences of Rural Students During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Multicultural Education, 9(2), 89-101. https://mc-caddogap.com/wp-content/ uploads/galleyproof-paper-9-of-vol-9-issue-2.-upd.pdf
12.Kirsten, K. (2022). On-campus vs distance learning in university preparatory courses : Which factors influence students ' course decisions ?
13.Konstantinidis, K., Apostolakis, I., & Karaiskos, P. (2022). A narrative review of e-learning in professional education of healthcare professionals in medical imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography, 28(2), 565-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. radi.2021.12.002
14.Mugenda, M. &. (1999). The Relationship between Service Quality and Customer Loyalty in the Kenyan Mobile Telecommunication Service Industry. 5(23), 26-37.
15.Nompumelelo. (2016). Effective Teacher Professional Development Using Technology Section 1: Introduction Section 2: Methodology Section 3: Technology and TPD Section 4: At-Scale TPD Section 5: Takeaways In te ra ct ive do cu m en t. www.worldbank.org
16.Ronzon, T., Gurria, P., Carus, M., Cingiz, K., El-Meligi, A., Hark, N., Iost, S., M'barek, R., Philippidis, G., van Leeuwen, M., Wesseler, J., Medina-Lozano, I., Grimplet, J., Díaz, A., Tejedor-Calvo, E., Marco, P., Fischer, M., Creydt, M., Sánchez-Hernández, E., … Miras Ávalos, J. M. (2025). Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1-14. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28459981/%0 Ahttps://doi.org/10. 1016/j.resenv.2025.100208%0Ahttp://scioteca.caf.com/bits tream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllow ed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps:
17.Rudhumbu, N. (2022). Implementation of the technical and vocational education and training curriculum in colleges in Botswana: challenges, strategies and opportunities. International Journal of Training Research, 20(2), 160-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1990106
18.Skinner, C. (2016). Analysis of Categorical Data for Complex Surveys. International Statistical Review, 87(S1), S64-S78. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12285
19.Tarus, J. K., & Gichoya, D. (2015). E-learning in Kenyan universities: Preconditions for successful implementation. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 66(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00474.x
20.Tarus, J. K., Gichoya, D., & Muumbo, A. (2015). Challenges of implementing E-learning in Kenya: A case of Kenyan public universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 120-141. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1816
21.UNESCO. (2020). Guidance on Open Educational Practices during School Closures: Utilizing OER under the COVID-19 Pandemic in line with UNESCO OER Recommendation Rights and Permissions. Un, 1(1), 1-59. http://creativ ecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/
22.Waiswa, J. (2020). COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response: Rethinking e-Learning in Uganda. May 1-14.
23.Young, T., Rohwer, A., Volmink, J., & Clarke, M. (2014). What are the effects of teaching evidence-based health care (EBHC)? Overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086706
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kenneth Bigabwa, Zam Zam Nyandara, Prisca Mbogo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SJ-Education publishes under the Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 international (CCBY-NC-ND 4.0) license which allows you to Share, Copy, and redistribute the materials in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms; 1. Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. 2. Non-commercial: You may not use the material for commercial purposes. Commercial use is one primarily intended for commercial advantage or monetary compensation. 3. No Derivatives: if you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. 4. No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
